Did our Net-Zero house build meet our energy goals the first year

By Matt

Utilizing higher levels of insulation, high performance windows, passive design, whole house electrification and a 9.8 kW solar energy system we were successful in being Net-Zero in 2019 with the house producing approximately 800 kWH more than we used.

We designed our Net-Zero house in early 2017 and broke ground fall of 2017 with the build being completed in late 2018. Solar panels were installed and commissioned on Jan 3, 2019. Now thats its 2020 we have a full year of energy efficient living and solar production so we can see if our design achieved our net-zero goal.

The design included double stud walls with low density spray foam for an R-35 wall, a raised hip roof with attic insulation to R-90, triple pane windows for an R-7, sizing and organizing the windows to capture the winter sun (passive design) with roof overhangs to block the summer sun and a concrete first floor slab to store thermal energy. The whole house was electrified from the stove to the home heating source and a 9.8 kW solar energy system was installed on the roof. The first indication that our design might be successful was the blower door test, where we achieved an Ach50 of 0.62 indicating that the house was very well sealed and we would not be losing much energy to infiltration. Our blower door test was performed by XRG energy concepts and they also calculated a whole house energy prediction based on our house and appliance parameters. They predicted that the house would use 10,905 kWH of electricity. Our solar panels were predicted to produce 12514 kWH of electricity per year, therefore; our house should produce a surplus of approximately 1600 kWH and be net-zero. Based on these calculations our HERS score came in at 33 with solar and -3 with solar. The HERS score of 33 indicates that we would use 67% less energy than a comparable reference home of our size and the -3 score indicates the house would produce more energy than it used every year.

How did the house perform? We ended up using 10636 kWH in 2019, which is amazingly close to the 10,905 calculated by XRG. Our solar panels generated 11434 kWH which was approximately 1000 kWH lower than the predicted amount, but we had really low numbers in January and February of 2019 due to overcast sky’s and snow on the panels. This means we were net-zero in 2019 with the house producing approximately 800 kWH more than we used.

We went net-zero on June 23, 2019. Our winter use of 41 kWH/day put us in deficit due to the lower solar collection and high heat pump use to heat the house, which then reversed in summer when we produced much higher solar energy (40-60 kWH/day) and did not have to heat the house therefore using only 23 kWH/day. We were net-zero 8 months out of the year, with Jan-Feb and Nov-Dec being our only deficit months.

Since we did not use the heat pump that much in summer to cool the house the summer kWH can be used as our typical whole house use when not using the heat pump (23 kWH/day) which then helps calculate how much energy we used during the year for heating. This indicates we used 2200 kWH for heating during the year. At a more conservative 22 kWH/day the calculation would be 2600 kWH/year for heating.

In addition we used 1087 kWH to heat our hot water which is in line with 1340 kWH predicted by the Energy Use Guide that came with the heater. This is probably for the average 4 person household. Overall then you can see that heating took up around 20% of our energy use while hot water was 10% and other appliances like clothes washer/dryer, stove, computers, etc took up 70% of our energy use.

Typically when its sunny out our solar panels produce way more than we need so in reality most of ones solar power is shipped out to the grid for others to use. In 2019 we only used 30% of our own solar power and shipped the other 70% to the grid. It would be nice to have significant battery storage so we could use more of our own solar power. Some combination of car battery and wall mounted battery in the 60-80 kWH range would be great. The addition of an electric car would use about 14 kWH per day or 5000 kWH (20000 miles) a year.

We of course incur significant costs for being tied to the grid and it would be nice someday to be totally off the grid but is not really practical for the large shifts in energy use from winter to summer. A large portion of our energy costs is embedded in the monthly service charge ($37) and the grid access fee (~26$). The grid access fee is charged to solar and wind producers because the monthly service charge does not cover all of the infrastructure, some of which is embedded in the cost of the kWH used, which since we are net zero would not be payed by us. The basic service charge and grid access fee almost total 50% of the cost that we payed for access to the grid.

In 2019 we saved 1342$ by producing our own electricity.

One final calculation is how energy efficient is the house to heat relative to its size and the number of heating degree days (how cold was it). This is calculated as kWH used to heat / size of house in square feet / # HDD. Based on a more conservative 22 kWH base use load (we used 23 kWH above) we used 2606 kWH to heat last year, the home is 2100 sq ft of conditioned space (if you include basement), and there was 8561 heating degree days in 2019. 2606 kWH/2100 sq ft/8561 HDD = 0.000145 kWH / Ft2-HDD. This is comparable to the Up-Hill house in upper New York which came in at 0.000154 kWH / Ft2-HDD (smaller the number the better) and on the low end of the high performances homes built by Transformations INC. These homes averaged 0.00013 to 0.0004 kWH/ft2/HDD, with most being approximately 0.00025 kWH/ft2/HDD when basements were included. See our previous post on how I calculated our possible heating use.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *